Club Penguin Free Accounts 2010

Editorial" El Dia de Tenerife

This article was published on April 6, 2011 in Santa Cruz de Tenerife by the newspaper El Dia. "

Zapatero a politician who has ruined Spain in the economic and moral. However, like canaries, then give them to us all. While we are not an independent state, while not manage our own resources, we go wrong with Zapatero, Rajoy and anyone to lead us to 2,000 miles away without understanding our idiosyncrasies and, However, without realizing that Colonialism is untenable, as well as infamous, in the XXI century.


And worse still is the apathy or acquiescence of many politicians consenting canaries. Can not remember the Canarian people how we were owned by the English nation, far more than 1,400 kilometers and located in another continent that is not ours?


why the Spaniards are to enjoy the resources and riches of the Canary Islands? How is it possible that these islands which, although not very well experienced in the past, timed to the Holy Inquisition and dictatorships, itself relatively well lived?


The situation has changed. We are no longer the Fortunate Islands or the Garden of the Hesperides. Now the misery has been taken over the Canaries.


Misery, Don Paulino, misery, even if you move by helicopter. Poverty, hunger and humiliation at the arrogance of the peninsular and, worse, self-reliance and the despotism of the Goth living among us. or oppresses us from the Peninsula.


do not realize how we govern our people? But liars like politicians current (bolsilleros living off the sweat of people), but new people, people from a new policy. People able to get the freedom that belongs to us as creatures of God, for God made all His creatures free.


Men and women with the mind and clean hands, capable of achieving for us identity and dignity that we deserve. In short, a new policy and new politicians who give us all we need in abundance.


Canaries today live with the indignity of being a colony. That is, we live so unworthy. Of course, we save the honor of some institutions, as the English Army. Again we express our admiration for him because he's an army slaughtered, obedient and also very humbled by the Socialist Party. Army may not need a canary when we're a sovereign nation, and those savings can be an added richness to our people.


With independence we have money to eat, to dress, to have adequate health care, travel and, ultimately, to live well.


Canario, now is your chance to get all this by giving your support to the Patriotic Movement so that if you have not reached independence in the regional parliament are the only ones struggling peacefully, without concessions, the freedom of my land.


will also, once freed from colonial rule, a self-righteousness. A justice is not politicized and influenced by Las Palmas, which is where the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Canarias, which seems tanbien Canarión who are using their own benefit. Human justice, which is the largest after divine justice, has fallen victim to the corrupt politicians, journalists of the newspaper and immoral, the Goths four reporters that treacherous still making mischief, and those serving the Goths.


current Justice, without which we all live in Pendura, is not the best justice we can have. So we cry we cry freedom justice as the Canary Islands, which will achieve justice when their sovereignty. We trust God to make it happen fast.


Although we be accused of being fascist by the expression, in the Canaries since daybreak. That is, in the Canary Islands begins to dawn, Where is refuge from the scorn of people who today are betraying us, surrendering to the killers of the Metropolis? Where will those who are allowing it to carry our goods to Madrid as English gold went to Moscow?

NOTE

this
The above Scriptwriter speaks in language akin to those of FET and the Jons, mixed with ideas and a certain tone Zarzalluz catalufo victim of spoliation. Know
, friends canaries, this blogger has not taken anything, but that nothing, not even eat bananas, property of the canaries, and one believed that there also dawn every day, but apparently not. Also, I let them know, by the forgetfulness that seems to have, in Spain and are not Goths or drawings. Those who fled the burning of Muza perhaps took refuge in the Canary Islands, but here I've certainly never seen one. Even in Complutum.

Tellagorri

newspaper editorial tenerife

How Do U Start A Walkie Talkie Conversation

Republic II: The Age of Hate

The Republic, although from time to time be glorified myth, is an experience undemocratic and governing elites that had very little modeling, to the extent that only by force would be considered the predecessor of the current English democracy. Beyond the progress that drove (the extension of suffrage to women, social reform, enlargement citizenship rights to the popular, educational policy ...) left much to be desired as a pluralistic system based on the agreement and consensus.

In this respect, had a great responsibility, no doubt, political and social forces that were not identified with the democratization project started in 1931. Individual exceptions rather rare, the political groups that fed this abundant flow authoritarian (traditionalist monarchists, Catholics corporate fascists) did not look at democracy as a point of arrival.

But the Republic not only found obstacles in their right flank. The questioning of this democracy also left the world of the Left, particularly the revolutionary left. The Communists

, which were few, and especially syndicalists declared war on the Republic virtually at birth. In fact, until 1934 the main obstacle stood in the way of democratization were the second. His leadership during these dates undemocratic was much more important than the destabilizing impulses fired from the conservative world.

For socialist, although not his ideal model, the Republic would only be for them and for Republicans, and therefore only they should be their exclusive managers.

Given its "revolutionary and popular" the new regime could only be administered "by the genuine representatives of the people who had brought" . Accordingly, his enemies and opponents were automatically out of the foundational fact. The manifesto released a few days of April 14 by the socialist executive left no room for doubt: " The English Republic which now begins, and which we must be vigilant guardians us, is something essentially ours because our Heat was born and our heat has to assert himself and improved in future. "

Under these assumptions it is understood that the Socialists did not conceive the republican democracy as a pluralistic democracy, liberal and representative where you feel comfortable all English, but as forged a revolutionary democracy, even in part to his image and likeness .

His speech stressed that only those who had accepted the revolutionary legitimacy of origin could be legally and constitutionally entitled to exercise the power and be endowed with the consideration of forces loyal . Thus, from his particular interpretation of the Republic began to walk as a system that excluded opponents which punished (or at best restricted) the disparity of opinions, subordinating individual liberty to the collective progress of society .

The mere fact that the National Action (right) is present at the elections to try to bring deputies to the Constituent was a gesture that seemed inconceivable, since the end of the day did not represent anyone. Were "the leper Spain, whose carcass was buried forever," the real people who work and study, suffering and love. "

The deployment of insults with which they received the return of Catholics into the political arena so surprised by his richness of expression as its relentless ferocity and irony. Just one example among thousands of the newspaper "El Socialista" (27-5-1931): " is coming, coming! [...] The crowd of vermin, of foxes, of avechuchos of vermin, vampire of crows, martens, of owls, reptiles, jackals, hyenas and other animals infected animánculos damaging the country until the advent of the Republic, now becomes hellish cacophony of squawks, squeaks, howls, whistles and roars ".

Since the early summer of 1933 many circles Socialists began to stroke out loud the idea of \u200b\u200bthe dictatorship of the proletariat. Although the thing was in the air, the knock on the socialist revolutionary turn was made by famous public pronouncements Largo Caballero, who succeeded without interruption since July.

The enthusiasm with which he received the arrival of the Republic in 1931, now vanished as if by magic. In an interview with Santiago Carrillo in late September, Caballero elaborated with the sincere toughness that characterized him, giving readers the most anti-democratic core of his thought: " I do not know how anyone has such a horror of dictatorship of the proletariat, a working potential violence. Is not it a thousand times preferable to violence working to fascism? "

In the twelve months, both out of doors and in private, they went on without respite from the fascist threat (without specifying exactly what was it) of the obligation to be vigilant and the need to arm themselves to the revolution.

After the fall of the government in early September Azaña and its replacement by a government Lerroux (neither right nor left) The verbal escalation took almost apocalyptic tones. Since the "crippled cart republican democracy" had expelled "with contempt" power, opening the door to "fascist" Lerroux, there was no other way to conquer "the way is" to "realize the historical necessity of our time: the governing socialist dictatorship of the proletariat ".

The positions of the knights were gaining weight everywhere, to the point that almost all socialists (except the group of Besteiro) eventually endorse them.

The overwhelming victory of the center right and the Socialists and exasperated his speech erased any trace of respect for the law established. The least was that they had been deeply involved in its construction while part the Government. not accepted defeat and were willing to violate the rules of democracy. In its ideological schemes was not considered as normal alternation in the exercise of power .

well is evident, then, that for the socialist republic was not equal to democracy. The only sector socialist who opposed these plans was represented by leaders who still controlled Besteiristas UGT.

expressly abandoned the insurrectionary goals. At a meeting of National Committee of the UGT held on December 13 in camera, denied Saborit on the Republic had given a real threat of fascism: "Is it de que hay un peligro inmediato de fascismo? Yo digo que eso seriamente no hay quien lo diga ..."

En abril de 1934, las Juventudes Socialistas ratificaron en un congreso su apuesta por la insurrección armada y la dictadura del proletariado. Al tiempo que dieron por agotado el "régimen burgués", desarrollaron una organización militar propia que conllevó el acopio de armas y el adiestramiento de los militantes en muchos sitios.

Todo esto lo ha intentado repetir la camarilla-pandilla de ese Largo Caballero de León, nacido en Valladolid, en el periodo de 2004 a 2011, Y han usado exactamente idéntica mentalidad que la de 1930.

Tellagorri

second republic was hatred